Reference: Robichaud, J.-M., Mageau, G. A., Soenens, B., Mabbe, E., Kil, H., Frenette, J., & Roy, M. (2024). Should parents combine reasoning with firm control to nurture adolescent socialization? Comparing logical consequences with mild punishments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000409 Trying to discipline a teenager? When parents think their reasoning and rules alone failed, they tend to use one of two different types of punishments, both without harsh words, to correct their teen’s behavior. Mild punishment (“You’re grounded!” “No video games for a week!” likely creates resistance, noncompliance. Logical Consequences in a kind voice (“No cell phone use until homework is complete.”) connects the issued punishment with the problem created by the misbehavior to promote learning lessons. Canadian psychological researchers examined the impact these two punishments have on the development of teenager growth/independence. They questioned 437 teens (ages 14 to 17; 53% girls), about parental responses to commonly violated rules. Researchers measured the teens’ responses to punishment, as well as how well they accepted the reasons to comply. Results? When parents used Logical Consequences, teens showed more compliance and independence, whereas this relationship was weaker/ where parents used Mild punishments. The use of logical consequences promoted teen autonomy, allowing them to accept the intended lesson, while also ensuring compliance. Parents! Seek to maintain discipline for your teen while promoting your teen’s growth. Give reasons kindly for your rules and logical consequences —tie the consequences to your rule or request!

Written by Angelo Penna, M.A.